Proofread – Then Repeat

Proofread – Then Repeat

by Katrina Shawver

proofreading-tips

An author has only one chance to make a good first impression with readers. I know with certainty that it takes time and multiple trained eyes to catch every error. My standard for proofreading has become this: I am never done.

If you think the detail of a single comma does not matter, think again. In March 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld a $13 million class action case for the “want of a comma” that changed the entire meaning of a critical clause in a labor contract.

My nonfiction manuscript has been through more reviews and versions than I can count. My writing critique group helped me work through the earliest confusions and issues, chapter by chapter. I sent sections to any friend who offered: “I’m happy to take a look.” I spent years compiling research. Eventually, I burned out and invested in hiring a developmental editor. She made all the difference.

From this professional editor, I learned critical things I did not know that I did not know. The nuance of a serial – also known as the Oxford – comma. When to use a hyphen, an en-dash, and an em-dash. How to format, according to the requirements of The Chicago Manual of Style, which, for example, is different from AP style and the Gregg Reference Manual I was used to.

That professional edit potentially saved me years of shopping the book around. I only sent 14 queries, and of those 14, four publishers requested the manuscript. Of those four, two offered contracts. An even larger publisher offered to purchase the book after I had already signed a contract with another publisher.

When I needed to submit the manuscript to my publisher’s editor for their own touches, I was assured “You’ll be in excellent hands.” Though I was supremely confident in my work, I chose to invest a full day in re-reading the entire thing, word for word, slowly, aloud from a printed copy before sending it off. I was stunned at the minor details both my first editor and I had missed six months earlier, and the number of word choices and phrasings I wanted to change. I now understand why so many writers swear by the practice of setting aside a project for a few months to final edit and proof with “fresh” eyes.

As it turned out, I was in adequate but not perfect hands. She gave the manuscript a polish, came up with great formatting suggestions, added headings, and even caught some context issues. Nevertheless, I still found more than 150 minor corrections to her corrections. After three back-and-forth passes of corrections, I would not see the book until it was in a formatted pdf.

Guess what? In converting to new software, new errors occurred. It was incredibly frustrating to see missing spaces, errant italics, and other errors where there had been none in the Word version. I marked everything I could find and submitted them. Two more rounds of back-and-forth corrections ensued. I would not see it again until it was in bound format.

Henry ARC cover.jpg

The box of Advanced Reader Copies (ARCs) arrived. Oh, the sweet jubilation as I held my “finished” book in my hands. Flipping through it, I found an error on the back cover text. An entry in the table of contents did not match a last-minute revision later in the book. A friend identified several errors. Sufficiently paranoid, I once again invested an entire day in reading every word aloud. I made several passes. Once to match headings and page numbers to the table of contents. Once to measure that the headings were consistently spaced. Another to verify various data issues were consistent throughout. Each pass found something to correct. The ARC acquired more Post-It notes for “final” corrections than I would like to admit, even though many were not my errors.

In conclusion, I learned multiple lessons in publishing my first book:

  • Each conversion of software is an opportunity for new errors. Thoroughly check each one.
  • Budget the time for multiple days of proofreading every single word, from front cover to back cover, on each edition. Each complete proofreading took me eight keep calm and proofreadhours.
  • For me, there is no substitute for proofreading from a printed copy. The minute differences between commas, periods, and semi-colons can be easily missed on a monitor, and in my case were confused in multiple places. My editor maintained she never prints out her projects.
  • I paged through the eBook version, again a separate version. Somehow the last sentence in the book was omitted, which I attribute to an unintentional technical error.
  • Never, and I mean never, accept your editor’s polish as the final, perfect edition without your own final, careful review. Similarly, never publicly blame your editor. Like signing off on a tax return, it is ultimately the author’s responsibility to get it right. After all, it is the author’s name on the cover of the book, not the editor’s.

____________________
Katrina ShawverKatrina Shawver is the author of Henry, A Polish Swimmer’s True Story of Friendship from Auschwitz to America, officially released on November 1, 2017. The book is published through Koehler Books and is available in hardback, paperback, and ebook formats on most book sites worldwide. Visit KatrinaShawver.com where she blogs regularly.

Please Share

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Katrina Shawver and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Proofread – Then Repeat

  1. Katrina, congratulations on your book! I so agree with all of your points on editing/proofreading. Once is never enough! It’s disheartening to continue to find minor errors in a manuscript or proof copy, despite so many pairs of eyes having combed through it. But such is the nature of publishing.

    Like

  2. VetCollector says:

    Katrina,

    Thank you for your openness in sharing your experiences regarding your efforts to bring Henry to the public. I think that in reading this post that I am having nightmares ahead of going to bed. I had two well respected, best-selling authors review my manuscript and red lined numerous changes and provided much needed guidance for flow, consistency and structure. These folks missed a lot of my mistakes that became visible on the advance copy. More edits, more changes and more review cycles ensued. After catching them all, we pulled the trigger and wouldn’t you know, two pages in, one glaring error that so few people would see…but I see it as a prevalent and glaring issue. There were a few more but it pains me to go back and read the book. I have made edits to the subsequent printings (it is a print-on-demand book) but it is a sore spot for me.

    I am the worst editor of my self-produced content (as my wife, who is the real professional, would attest) but I believe that I am fairly adept at reviewing others’ work.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s